What outcomes generally result from a lack of Congressional approval in presidential foreign policy?

When a president does not secure Congressional approval for foreign policy initiatives, one common outcome is a greater reliance on direct executive action. The U.S. Constitution grants the president significant powers in conducting foreign affairs, such as the ability to negotiate treaties and manage diplomatic relations, but these actions often require Congressional support for funding and implementation. In the absence of this approval, a president may choose to bypass Congress by utilizing executive orders, unilateral actions, or even military engagement under the War Powers Resolution. This approach allows the president to exert influence and take decisive actions without waiting for legislative consent.

Presidents may resort to these executive actions to advance their foreign policy goals, especially in urgent situations where Congressional approval would take too long or where they anticipate a lack of support from lawmakers. This increased use of executive power can sometimes lead to tensions between the executive and legislative branches regarding the appropriate balance of authority in foreign policy matters.