What has led to the idea of the imperial presidency?

The idea of the imperial presidency originates primarily from the combination of various factors, including the perception of crises, such as national security threats, and the historical context of the Cold War, particularly the fear of communism. These elements have led to a centralization of power within the executive branch, as presidents have asserted greater authority to respond quickly and effectively to perceived threats.

The term "imperial presidency" suggests that the president has accumulated more power than is constitutionally provided, often bypassing Congress and other checks and balances in emergencies. The exigencies of foreign policy, especially in times of crisis, have enabled presidents to expand their roles and responsibilities, frequently leading to actions that facilitate their unilateral decision-making.

This centralization of power can be observed in various instances throughout history where presidents have taken significant actions without immediate or prior congressional approval, emphasizing a shift toward executive dominance in the face of challenges perceived as urgent. The dynamic of fear, particularly during the Cold War, has led society to support stronger executive action in the name of security and stability, reinforcing the concept of the imperial presidency.