What do executive agreements suggest about modern presidents?

Executive agreements reflect the tendency of modern presidents to engage in international agreements without requiring the formal approval of the Senate, which is typically necessary for treaties. By utilizing executive agreements, presidents are able to act more swiftly and independently in foreign policy matters. This approach allows them to potentially sidestep the legislative checks and balances that are meant to involve Congress in significant national decisions.

This practice underscores a broader trend in the presidency where there is an increasing reliance on unilateral executive action, especially in areas where timely responses are crucial, such as international relations. This shift suggests that modern presidents may prioritize efficiency and control over the collaborative approach established by the Constitution, thereby minimizing the legislative branch's influence in these situations.

The other options do not capture this nuanced relationship between executive authority and legislative oversight effectively, as they address different aspects of government power dynamics that are not as directly related to the use of executive agreements.